Thursday, January 17, 2013

Just Push This Button

       “His mother also told him how the chiming of that old bell had once filled her heart with joy and confidence, and that in the midst of the sweet tones her child had been given to her. And the boy gazed on the large, old bell with the deepest interest. He bowed his head over it and kissed it, old, thrown away, and cracked as it was, and standing there amidst the grass and nettles. The boy never forgot what his mother told him, and the tones of the old bell reverberated in his heart…” from The Old Church Bell, Hans Christian Andersen, 1861


Checking the Facebook page the other morning, I noticed my buddy was on. Like me, she’s a late comer to Facebook. In fact, she’s still learning the ropes. I pull up the chat page – “Hi!” I type. No response…. aaaand….no response.

My eye strays to the latest issue of The Economist sitting on my desk. The magazine is open to a small article about Christian churches in Jerusalem making the move from human-powered bells calling the faithful, to mechanical bells.

Rarely in this fractious holy city do clerics cede rights for which they used to wage holy wars. But from the Abbey of the Dormition to Jesus’s resting place in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, the bell-ringers of Jerusalem are abandoning their ropes after a century and a half, and installing automated timers instead.

The computer emits a lilting, gurgle-ring. It’s my buddy. “Hey!” she’s typed. “I had to ask my son what to do because I’ve never chatted on FB before.”

We type back and forth about what they’ve been up to the last few days, how she just took her son to see the Hobbit at the IMAX theatre and what they thought. “It was amazing,” she says. “I’ve never read the book, but I really liked the movie.”

“Confession time,” I respond. “I've never made it through the book either.”

“No way!”

“Way.”

My eye strays back to the Economist article.

…times and technology change. The churches now compete for the latest mod cons, including manpower-saving bells that chime at the touch of a button. “The old way was kind of a hassle,” sighs Athanasius Macora, a Franciscan friar whose church was the city’s first to automate its bells. “You had to be there on time.”

After a few minutes, the computer gurgles again  (I’m sure she’s doing other things, too). “So, this is kind of fun.”

“Yeah,” I type. “I have friends...they spend a lot of time online, and they always stop by and say hi when I get on. It’s kind of the equivalent of chatting over the fence while you’re hanging out the laundry.”

…With their bells on autopilot, the churches can compete with the mosques [who record and broadcast their calls to prayer] and the air-siren that Israelis use to call in the Sabbath.

“I can see that,” she types. “I miss being there with you, though, face to face. It’s not really the same.”

Aesthetes say they can hear a difference between traditional bell-ringing and today’s phoney jingling bells.

“Me too, G,” I smile a smile she can’t see. “I miss you, too.”


6 comments:

  1. I received this comment via email with permission to post here...


    Almost three years ago we rented a house that backs up to an Episcopal church. From 8 am 'til 8 pm they have bells ring in every hour of every day (one bell on the half).

    At first I was really disappointed to discover this. I thought it would be a tremendous annoyance. But after only a few days I began to like them. They were oddly comforting. And occasionally handy.

    They sounded so real that at first I thought they must really have a belfry in their steeple. I was unsure for weeks. I finally broached the subject with my neighbor - a church member I'd already become friends with (a pound of Starbucks Coffee and a tray of fresh blueberry scones every now and then helps speed that process along remarkably fast) who confirmed with a smile that the bells are indeed digital and not analog.

    Oh well. I'd kind of figured that would be the case. They were still very real sounding. We'll leave this home in June and I know I'll miss them.

    People often talk about how Facebook is a poor substitute for spending real time with your friends, but I think it's just an enhancement to your friendships and your ability to stay connected. Just as email made sending "letters", if you will, easier (the loss of seeing your friend's scrawl put to real paper by real pen is another casualty related to those we're discussing here), Facebook lets me stay connected with Carrol and Steve working in Zambia, Karen in Waxhaw, Stephen (and dozens of others) in Portland, and Sean & Lisa in Boise. (This week Stephen bumped it up a notch by actually calling me and letting me hear his voice and enjoy a real conversation.)

    My friends also use fb to plan and coordinate real life parties and our monthly Supper Club, and to set up lunch and coffee meetings and such. So even here fb facilitates real life meetings.

    I don't see any downside to it. In fact, I'd bet dollars to blueberry scones that neither you nor G were planning to call the other - not that you never do - that particular morning. So the Facebook chat was a delightful and comforting surprise. A serendipitous connection.

    Just like the bells in June, you might miss connecting with friends on fb if you couldn't now. :-)

    And yes, I know you just saw me smile.

    Ren

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I completely agree. Nostalgia for the old doesn't keep me from thoroughly enjoying the new...one of the many paradoxes I exist in.

      Delete
  2. Isaiah stayed home sick the other day, and in the chaos of getting him settled and myself getting out the door to work, I went and left my cell on the bed. When I got to work and realized I "had no phone" I was panicked. As I'm sitting at my office desk, the thought of Isaiah needing something and not being able to get ahold of me stressed me out. The sad part...there was a phone sitting right in front of me; I didn't think about the fact that he could just call my "regular" phone, or I could pick it up and call him, "old school" style. But the truth is, our default way of communicating today is a text message, and it's a wee bit sad to me that the boys will barely know the joy of writing and sending a letter, or receiving something in the mail, and that I and thier mother will need to make it a priority to actually teach them the "skill" of having a conversation, so they can be in a live social situation and hold their own. Otherwise, i can see it now, a room full of 20 year olds face down in their smart phones.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I love this comment..."a wee bit sad"...yes, it is. Hope Isaiah is recovering!

      Delete
  3. Wow, as they say, there is always two sides of the story, and I agree with both Ren and Paul. I totally can relate to Paul because my eldest is often with his face down texting on his phone, and I am in the room trying to have a conversation with him. At the same time, my mom communicates best via texting. It is weird for me to think of her being comfortable doing that because she has always been so anti-computer. In the end, I am so grateful that I can have a real conversation with my family and close friends whether it be texting, email, fb, dial up, or in person. What makes it all real is that it is really happening, both parties are making an effort, both are caring enough to have a genuine relationship and communicate with each other. We as Christian can use technology for good and have it be a blessing to others. Thanks Lisa for your blog. Who would have ever thought when we did our walks in the Coulee and talked about email and the future of possibly having to communicate that way with each other that it would really happen? I still enjoy writing cards and postcards. It is like, really fun to receive one too. Hey, I know someone that actually makes notecards and people buy them. It's a balance, and it's all good if used for His Glory.

    ReplyDelete

Please leave me a note. Comments are moderated and posted within 24 hours of submission. Thanks!